By Neha Juneja
Therapist | Mental Health Professional
Based on the book The Courage to Be Disliked by Ichiro Kishimi and Fumitake Koga.
What if you are not unhappy because of your past, your circumstances, your family, or the way people treat you, but because of the meaning you have attached to these experiences?
What if you could live freely without constantly worrying about:
This is the central idea of The Courage to Be Disliked.
The book introduces Adlerian Psychology, developed by Alfred Adler. It challenges several conventional ways of thinking about happiness, relationships, self-worth, childhood experiences and personal freedom.
Its central message is:
You do not need everyone’s approval to live a meaningful and satisfying life. You need the courage to live according to your own values.
Let’s understand all its major psychological concepts.
This is one of the most important concepts in the book.
There are two ways of understanding human behaviour.
Causality:
Your present behaviour is explained through past experiences.
For example:
This is the causal perspective.
Teleology:
Instead of asking only what caused the behaviour, we ask what purpose the behaviour serves in the present.
For example:
A person says:
“I cannot make friends because I am socially anxious.”
The teleological perspective asks:
“What might staying away from social situations help this person avoid?”
Possible answers:
The person’s anxiety may be functioning as a reason to avoid situations where rejection is possible.
Causality asks:
“What happened to make me this way?”
Teleology asks:
“What purpose is my current behaviour serving?”
The book’s argument: People are not simply controlled by their past. They can reconsider the purposes behind their present behaviour and choose different responses.
An important qualification: This is Adler’s philosophical and psychological perspective, not proof that trauma, neurological conditions or past experiences are irrelevant. These factors can significantly influence behaviour.
The book challenges the idea that a traumatic experience automatically determines someone’s future.
For example:
Two people experience similar childhood criticism.
The experiences may be similar, but their responses and interpretations differ.
The book suggests that we should not assume that the past completely determines the present.
The important lesson:
You cannot change what happened to you, but you can work towards changing how you understand it and how you respond to it.
Your history is part of your story. It does not have to become the definition of your identity.
One of the book’s strongest arguments is that most psychological difficulties are connected to interpersonal relationships.
Consider:
Even when a problem appears personal, it may involve how you perceive yourself in relation to other people.
For example:
Someone earns a reasonable income but feels unsuccessful because their friends earn more.
The difficulty is not necessarily their income.
It is the meaning they attach to the comparison.
They may believe:
“If I earn less than others, I am less successful.”
This creates unnecessary suffering.
The lesson: Examine the standards through which you evaluate yourself. Are they genuinely yours, or are they borrowed from society?
These are two different concepts.
An inferiority feeling is the awareness that there is something you lack or want to improve.
For example:
These feelings are not necessarily unhealthy.
They can motivate growth.
An inferiority complex develops when someone uses a perceived weakness as a justification for believing that they cannot move forward.
For example:
“I cannot become successful because I did not study at a prestigious university.”
“I cannot build relationships because I am not attractive.”
“I cannot achieve anything because I am not as intelligent as my colleagues.”
The person moves from recognising a limitation to treating that limitation as an absolute barrier.
Inferiority feeling:
“I am not good at this yet.”
Inferiority complex:
“I am not good at this, therefore I cannot succeed.”
The first allows improvement.
The second restricts possibilities.
Sometimes people try to hide their inferiority feelings by presenting themselves as superior.
Examples:
The person may appear highly confident, but their self-worth remains dependent on comparison.
The book suggests that superiority and inferiority complexes can be connected.
Both involve evaluating oneself through a hierarchy.
The solution is not to become superior to others. It is to stop making superiority the condition for feeling worthy.
This is another central teaching.
Imagine that you and your friend are running on two different tracks.
Your friend earns more, gets promoted and achieves professional recognition.
You are progressing differently.
If you consider life a competition, your friend’s success becomes evidence of your failure.
But if life is not a competition, your friend’s success does not reduce your value.
You can appreciate another person’s achievements without feeling threatened.
The book encourages moving away from vertical relationships, where people are ranked as superior or inferior, towards horizontal relationships, where people have equal human worth despite different abilities and achievements.
Someone can be more successful than you without being more valuable than you.
This is arguably the most practical concept in the entire book.
Adlerian psychology encourages us to distinguish between:
These are called the separation of tasks.
You decide to pursue psychology.
Your family prefers that you pursue another profession.
Your task:
Your family’s task:
You cannot control their approval.
You behave respectfully towards someone.
However, that person dislikes you.
Your task:
Their task:
You cannot make another person like you.
Do your task without trying to control the outcome of someone else’s task.
A lot of emotional exhaustion comes from trying to manage other people’s:
The book suggests that freedom begins when you stop taking responsibility for outcomes that do not belong to you.
Think about how many decisions people make because they fear disappointing someone.
Examples:
The problem is not that we care about other people.
The problem arises when their expectations become the primary basis for our decisions.
The book argues that constantly seeking approval makes us dependent on other people’s evaluations.
You begin living according to what others want rather than what you genuinely value.
Freedom means accepting that some people may disagree with your choices.
You can respect someone without obeying every expectation they have of you.
This is the central message of the book.
Why do people struggle to live freely?
Because they are afraid of being disliked.
They want:
But these desires can become psychological traps.
For example:
You express an honest opinion.
Someone disagrees.
You immediately start questioning yourself:
“Did I say something wrong?”
“Will they think badly of me?”
“Should I have remained quiet?”
“How can I make them like me again?”
The need for approval makes you modify yourself repeatedly.
The book suggests that freedom requires accepting a possibility:
Not everyone will like you, even when you are behaving appropriately.
Being disliked does not automatically mean you have done something wrong.
It may simply mean that another person has a different perspective, preference or expectation.
However, this does not mean deliberately hurting people, ignoring feedback or refusing accountability.
The courage to be disliked is the courage to remain authentic while respecting others.
These involve hierarchy, superiority and inferiority.
Examples:
Even praise and criticism can sometimes reinforce this hierarchy.
These involve equality of human worth.
For example:
A manager may have more professional authority than an employee.
A teacher may have more knowledge than a student.
But neither person’s basic human worth is greater.
The book encourages developing horizontal relationships.
This does not mean everyone has identical skills, responsibilities or authority.
It means that differences in ability and position should not become differences in human value.
This is a particularly interesting concept.
The book questions the psychological role of praise and criticism.
Why?
Because both can establish a vertical relationship.
When someone praises you, they may position themselves as the person who evaluates your performance.
When someone criticises you, they may similarly position themselves as the evaluator.
For example:
A child completes a task.
Parent says:
“Good job! You are such a good child.”
The child may gradually learn to associate good behaviour with receiving approval.
The concern is that the child may begin acting to obtain praise rather than developing an internal sense of responsibility.
Similarly, criticism can make someone dependent on external evaluation.
The book introduces encouragement and expressions of gratitude.
Instead of:
“Good girl! You did exactly what I wanted.”
Say:
“Thank you for helping me. Your contribution made things easier.”
Instead of:
“You are better than everyone else.”
Say:
“I appreciate the effort you put into this.”
The focus shifts from evaluating the person’s worth to acknowledging their contribution.
Recognition can become addictive.
Imagine someone who:
Their motivation becomes dependent on external recognition.
The book suggests that you should not make recognition the purpose of your actions.
You can do something meaningful even when nobody appreciates it.
For example:
You help someone because you genuinely want to help, not because you expect them to praise you.
You work towards professional development because it matters to you, not because you need everyone to admire your achievements.
Your actions do not lose their value simply because nobody recognises them.
This is one of Adler’s most important psychological concepts.
Community feeling refers to experiencing yourself as part of a larger human community rather than viewing life entirely through individual competition.
It involves three important ideas:
Let’s understand each.
Self-acceptance means acknowledging yourself realistically.
It does not mean believing that you are perfect.
It means recognising:
For example:
“I am not confident in every situation, but I can still participate.”
“I have made mistakes, but I can learn from them.”
“I am not as financially successful as someone else, but that does not make my life meaningless.”
Self-acceptance is different from self-approval.
Self-approval says:
“Everything I do is good.”
Self-acceptance says:
“I can acknowledge what needs improvement without rejecting myself.”
The book distinguishes between trust and confidence.
Trust is often associated with believing someone because there is a reason or guarantee to do so.
Confidence involves choosing to trust others without making that trust entirely dependent on guarantees.
For example:
If you constantly suspect that people will betray you, you may struggle to build meaningful relationships.
The book encourages developing a willingness to trust.
This does not mean ignoring red flags, tolerating exploitation or abandoning boundaries.
It means not allowing fear to become the foundation of every relationship.
The book suggests that happiness is closely connected to experiencing yourself as someone who contributes to others.
Contribution does not have to be extraordinary.
Examples:
The important thing is not how impressive the contribution appears.
It is the experience of being useful and connected.
The book suggests that a sense of worth develops when we experience ourselves as contributing members of society.
Notice the difference:
External validation:
“I am valuable because people appreciate me.”
Contribution-based sense of worth:
“I experience meaning because I can contribute to others.”
You do not need to be the most successful, intelligent, attractive or wealthy person to have a meaningful existence.
You can experience worth through ordinary participation in life.
Many people believe that they will become happy when they achieve something extraordinary.
For example:
The problem is that the goalposts keep moving.
After achieving one thing, another achievement becomes necessary.
The book challenges the belief that happiness requires being special.
It introduces the idea that we should develop the courage to be ordinary.
It does not mean being mediocre.
It means accepting that you do not need extraordinary achievements to justify your existence.
You do not have to prove that you are better than everyone else.
You can live an ordinary life without considering it an inferior life.
Your life does not become meaningful only when you become exceptional.
According to the book, happiness is closely related to the feeling that you are contributing to others.
Importantly, you do not necessarily need someone to acknowledge your contribution.
For example:
A psychologist helps a client develop greater emotional understanding.
Even if the client never publicly appreciates the psychologist, the work can still have meaning.
Similarly, someone caring for their family may experience satisfaction without receiving constant recognition.
The important distinction is between:
The second is less dependent on external approval.
The book challenges the idea that life is simply a journey towards a future achievement.
Many people live like this:
“I will be happy after completing my education.”
“I will be happy after getting a job.”
“I will be happy after earning more.”
“I will be happy after getting married.”
“I will be happy after achieving financial stability.”
But life keeps moving.
If happiness is always postponed until the next achievement, the present becomes something to tolerate rather than experience.
The book encourages focusing on the present moment.
It introduces an important distinction between two ways of understanding life.
You imagine your life as a journey moving towards a destination.
The focus is on the final achievement.
You recognise that each moment has its own value.
You do not need to reach a particular destination to justify the time you are living now.
This is connected to the book’s idea of living in the present.
The book uses the metaphor of dancing to explain how we should approach life.
When dancing, the focus is not necessarily on reaching a particular destination.
The experience of dancing itself matters.
Similarly, life should not be understood only through future outcomes.
You can experience meaning through the activities you engage in today.
For example:
Instead of thinking:
“I am studying only so that I can eventually become successful.”
You can recognise the value of learning itself.
Instead of thinking:
“I am working only to reach a particular position.”
You can recognise the meaning in the contribution you make through your work.
Life is not only about reaching somewhere. It is also about how you live each moment.
The philosophy becomes particularly useful when applied to everyday situations.
| Situation | Old way of thinking | Adlerian perspective |
|---|---|---|
| Someone dislikes you | I must have done something wrong. | Not everyone needs to like me. |
| Someone earns more | I am unsuccessful. | Their success does not reduce my worth. |
| Parents disagree with your career | I must change my decision. | Their approval is their task; my career decision is mine. |
| Nobody appreciates your work | My efforts are meaningless. | My contribution has value even without recognition. |
| You make a mistake | I am a failure. | I can acknowledge the mistake and improve. |
| Someone criticises you | I must prove myself. | I can evaluate whether the criticism is useful. |
| You feel inferior | I am not good enough. | I can improve without comparing my worth. |
| You fear rejection | I should avoid expressing myself. | I can accept that disagreement is possible. |
| You are not extraordinary | My life is ordinary and unsuccessful. | I do not need to be extraordinary to have a meaningful life. |
If we bring the entire philosophy together, five major lessons emerge.
Your experiences influence you, but they do not have to determine every future decision.
Someone else’s achievements do not make your achievements less valuable.
You are responsible for your decisions and actions, not for controlling everyone’s reactions.
You cannot live authentically while making universal approval a condition for every decision.
You do not need constant appreciation to experience meaning and self-worth.
The book becomes more useful when its ideas are applied to your own life.
Consider these questions:
About your past
About comparison
4. Whose achievements make me question my own worth?
5. What standards am I using to measure my success?
6. Would I still consider my life unsuccessful if I stopped comparing it with others?
About approval
7. How many of my decisions are influenced by the fear of disappointing someone?
8. Do I change my opinions because I genuinely reconsider them or because I fear rejection?
9. Can I tolerate someone disagreeing with me?
About relationships
10. Am I taking responsibility for other people’s emotions?
11. Do I expect appreciation in return for everything I do?
12. Am I treating relationships as competitions?
About happiness
13. Am I postponing happiness until I achieve something?
14. What makes my present life meaningful?
15. How do I contribute to other people’s lives without expecting recognition?
Perhaps the most powerful message of The Courage to Be Disliked is that freedom does not come from changing everyone’s opinion of you.
It comes from changing how much power you give those opinions over your life.
You can be a good person and still be disliked.
You can make the right decision for yourself and still disappoint someone.
You can be successful without being the most successful person in your family.
You can have limitations without considering yourself inferior.
You can live an ordinary life without believing that you have failed.
You can contribute meaningfully without receiving recognition.
And you can respect other people’s expectations without making those expectations the foundation of your existence.
The ultimate courage is not the courage to make everyone like you. It is the courage to live meaningfully even when everyone does not.
You are not here to win a competition against everyone else. You are here to live your own life.